Nasolabial Revisions in Unilateral Incomplete Cleft Lip: One Surgeon's 28-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Repair of unilateral incomplete cleft lip is the surgeon's opportunity to achieve a superior result with few revisions. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with unilateral incomplete cleft lip, defined as a defect extending 30 to 90 percent of cutaneous labial height, treated between 1985 and 2013 by one surgeon. Rates and types of revisions were collected, and photographs of patients who did not have a revision were reviewed to determine whether a revision was needed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven percent needed revision of the mucosal free margin; less than 10 percent needed other minor labial revisions. Fifteen percent required a nasal revision, most commonly reelevation of the lower lateral cartilage. Over time, the only statistically significant change in frequency was increased revisions of the free border. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal revision rates are low in unilateral incomplete cleft lip compared to complete forms in previously published data by the senior author (J.B.M.). In contrast, labial revisions of the free margin are more common. The reason is that the surgeon became more cognizant of vermilion-mucosal deficiency on the noncleft side and more likely to offer a submucosal flap or dermis-fat graft to level the lip for normal upper incisor show. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Effect of infant surgical orthopedic treatment on facial growth in preadolescent children with unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of dentofacial infant orthopedic treatment (DFIO) on facial growth in preadolescent children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCCLP) and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (BCCLP). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with UCCLP and BCCLP treated at a single center. The treatment group had DFIO, and the control group did not have DFIO. Regression models were used to compare outcomes between the study and control groups. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 81 patients (54 had DFIO and 27 did not have DFIO). Among those with UCCLP, those who had DFIO had a shorter maxillary length (-2.12 mm; P = .04) and shorter lower anterior facial height (-2.77 mm; P = .04) compared with controls. Among those with BCCLP, there were no significant differences between the treatment and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: DFIO treatment could result in shorter maxillary length and lower anterior facial height in those with UCCLP.

Patterns of tooth agenesis in patients with orofacial clefts.

Orofacial clefts are a common oral disorder associated with tooth agenesis. As information on the simultaneous absence of teeth can be an aid in treatment planning, a large sample of orofacial cleft patients was examined. The sample consisted of 910 patients with cleft lip and palate. Tooth agenesis was assessed on the basis of at least two panoramic radiographs and patient records. Third-molar agenesis was determined in 474 patients. Patterns of tooth agenesis were analysed using Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC) values, according to VAN WIJK & TAN. Per quadrant, at least 90% of patients could be described according to three different patterns. In the maxilla, 85% of patients with tooth agenesis had a TAC-value of 2, 16, or 18 on either the left side, right side or bilaterally. In the mandible, 90% of patients with tooth agenesis had a TAC-value of 16, 1 or 2 on either the left side, right side or bilaterally. In patients with tooth agenesis, patterns were symmetrical in the maxilla in 18.8% and in the mandible in 51%. More extended cleft types were associated with a higher prevalence of tooth agenesis. Third-molar agenesis (prevalence = 22.4%) was significantly related to the prevalence of other absent teeth. These results show which patterns of tooth agenesis can be expected to occur in most orofacial cleft patients.

Early frontofacial symmetry after correction of unilateral coronal synostosis: frontoorbital advancement vs endoscopic strip craniectomy and helmet therapy.

Frontoorbital advancement (FOA) improves forehead and superior orbital asymmetry associated with unilateral coronal synostosis but has little effect on facial asymmetry. This study compares frontofacial symmetry after FOA and endoscopically assisted suturectomy (ESC) and postoperative helmet therapy.A retrospective review of 2 cohorts of patients with nonsyndromic unilateral coronal synostosis who had either FOA or ESC was undertaken. Choice of procedure was determined by age of patient at referral (younger than 4 months, FOA or ESC; older than 4 months, only FOA). Vectra 3D imaging system (Canfield Imaging Systems, Fairfield, NJ) was used to capture and analyze three-dimensional digital images. Comparative anthropometric measurements were made and statistically analyzed.Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria; 11 underwent ESC at mean age of 2 months (range, 1-4 months) and 11 underwent FOA at mean age of 12 months (range, 8-25 months). Mean age at three-dimensional digital imaging was 45.9 months (range, 18-64 months) for the FOA group and 34.5 months (range, 20-66 months) for the ESC group (P = 0.054).There was no difference between the 2 groups with regard to supraorbital symmetry (P = 0.54). The ESC group exhibited better facial symmetry in midline deviation (3.6° vs 1.4°; P = 0.018), nasal tip deviation (5.6° vs 2.3°; P = 0.006), and middle facial depth (6.9 vs 4.4 mm; P = 0.042). Lower facial depth was similar (3.8 vs 2.3 mm; P = 0.54).Early ESC and helmet therapy results in comparable brow symmetry and better overall facial symmetry than FOA done in late infancy.

Current surgical management of bilateral cleft lip in North America.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine contemporary surgical management of bilateral cleft lip. METHODS: A survey was sent to North American cleft surgeons. Variables included number of bilateral cleft lip repairs per year, surgical specialty, and methods of nasolabial correction. The authors analyzed possible relationships between surgical specialty/volume and operative techniques. RESULTS: The response rate was 40 percent (241 of 600). Annual bilateral nasolabial repairs per surgeon were as follows: zero to two, 30 percent; three to five, 46 percent; and six or more, 25 percent. For bilateral complete cleft lip, dentofacial orthopedics was used by 71 percent of respondents; synchronous closure was most commonly performed (88 percent); infrequent techniques were preliminary labial adhesions (11 percent) and staged labial closure (1 percent); and 50 percent undertook primary nasal repair. One half of respondents used nostril splinting following primary or secondary nasal correction. For bilateral incomplete cleft lip, 90 percent of surgeons performed synchronous labial repair and 36 percent did primary nasal correction. For both complete and incomplete bilateral cleft lips, high-volume surgeons were more likely to excise prolabial vermilion and use lateral vermilion-mucosal flaps to form the median tubercle. For bilateral asymmetrical cleft lip, 85 percent of surgeons practiced synchronous labial repair and 54 percent used dentofacial orthopedics on the complete side. CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous repair was the most frequent method for bilateral cleft lip; one-half of surgeons practiced primary nasal correction. There were no associations between surgical specialty/volume and operative principles or techniques for bilateral nasolabial repair, except for construction of the median tubercle.

Severe hypodontia: identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis.

Tooth agenesis is the most common dental anomaly. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify common patterns of tooth agenesis in a sample of 92 patients (55 females and 37 males; mean age 27.7 years) with non-syndromic severe hypodontia. The Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC) procedure was used for that purpose. The patients in this study were missing between 6 and 22 permanent teeth (mean 11.6; median 10.0; SD 4.35). In the maxilla, 47.9 (left side) and 50.0 (right side) per cent can be described using only five different patterns. The most common patterns involved agenesis of the maxillary lateral incisor and both premolars. In the mandible, 35.8 (lower left) or 43.5 (lower right) per cent can be described by five patterns, the most common of which was agenesis of all mandibular premolars. When comparing patients with and without symmetric agenesis patterns (symmetry in the upper or lower arch versus no symmetry), a Student's t-test revealed no difference in the total number of missing teeth. Common patterns of tooth agenesis were successfully identified in patients with non-syndromic severe hypodontia. The present findings may be used to develop interdisciplinary treatment protocols for the most common patterns to increase the quality of interdisciplinary treatment for patients with severe hypodontia.

A numeric code for identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis: a new approach.

Human tooth agenesis involves the absence of one or more teeth and often refers to a genetic or a developmental disorder. Identifying whether certain patterns of tooth agenesis are more prevalent than others may prove valuable for treatment planning, as well as for genetic research into its etiology and development. In the present article a method is described where unique values are assigned to patterns of tooth agenesis. Using the idea of binary arithmetic, the absence or presence of teeth are represented by 1 and 0, and translated into corresponding unique values, the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC). This procedure has an advantage over existing methods in that it allows for easier data analysis. The method described in this article can advance genetic research towards the etiology of tooth agenesis, allows researchers to communicate unequivocally the phenotypes of their studied cases and it can be used in other areas of oral pathology that also require pattern recognition.